Demonstration dataA demonstration portfolio. Every property and every reading was authored to exercise the product. No hotel supplied any of it and no company is described.
Environmental intelligence cannot scale if nobody can see the provenance. Every reading below was refused by the engine — either because a model proposed it and no person has confirmed it, or because nothing was ever gathered. Neither reaches a score, and neither is treated as a zero.
Grade decides the ceiling on confidence. No intake can claim more certainty than its class of source allows.
| Grade | Readings | Confidence ceiling | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Partner confirmed | 33 | 100 | The partner asserted it, on the record. |
| Public source | 27 | 90 | Read on a named public source of record, with the citation retained. |
| Derived | 45 | 85 | Computed from a verified fact about the location, never from the property's own marketing. |
| AI proposal | 8 | 60 | Proposed by a model with retained evidence and no human verification. Does not reach the score. |
A reading arrives with a claimed confidence. The grade’s ceiling is applied when it is projected, not when it is rendered, so nothing downstream has to remember to apply it and no surface can accidentally show the claimed number instead of the allowed one. Where a claim was capped, the profile shows both figures.
Filter by property, dimension or class. Every row expands into everything a reviewer needs to act.
15 of 15 readings. Ages are measured against 2026-08-13, the newest verification date in this portfolio — never against today’s clock, so the same data always reads the same way.
An unknown is not a zero, and a proposal is not evidence.
Verification write-back is not built
Produced underscoring 1 · weights 4 · ontology 1 · climate model 1 · engagement 1 · min coverage 0.5